FSA will carry on work with EU safety body

By Rick Pendrous

- Last updated on GMT

FSA’s Hancock: ‘This is about strengthening regulations; making it better’
FSA’s Hancock: ‘This is about strengthening regulations; making it better’

Related tags: Food standards agency, Regulation

The Food Standards Agency (FSA) is confident that its plans for risk-based regulatory change under the Regulating our Future initiative will not be “knocked off course” by the outcome of the Brexit negotiations, currently underway.

“This is absolutely Brexit proof,”​ Heather Hancock, chair of the Food Standards Agency board, told Food Manufacture ​last month.

“We started it before Brexit and it will conclude just after the UK’s left the EU. And, if anything, it’s given more momentum to the need for us to be absolutely confident about the way in which the regulation and assurance system works.”

The relationship between the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the FSA would continue in some form after Brexit, Hancock asserted.

Continue to enforced after Brexit

Other regulations, which currently have EFSA oversight – such as the approval of novel foods, whose authorisation process is being amended on January 1 2018 – would also continue to enforced after Brexit, she added.

“There needs to be an inspection regime; there needs to be a regulation regime; those things still need to happen,”​ she stressed. “You can participate in EFSA and not be a member of the EU … I’m absolutely sure that we will have a continued relationship with EFSA.”

Hancock recognised that as it moved towards the new regulatory regime, the FSA would need to do more to gain the trust of the food industry and to encourage businesses to share the essential data it needed to make it work.

Gain the trust of the food industry

“What we have said is that under no circumstances would we share any data without the express permission of its owner in relation to this new regime,”​ Hancock stressed.

“We actually want specific data, which answers a specific question and we want them to give us access to it … We understand the concern​ [about undermining companies’ competitive position] and we don’t want that concern to get in the way of a better regulatory system that provides more assurance.”

Hancock also argued that the new regulatory regime would give more certainty, more oversight, more accountability and more evidence than is provided now.

Related news

Show more

Related products

Listeria Management & Drainage: 5 Essential Steps

Listeria Management & Drainage: 5 Essential Steps

Aco Building Drainage | 26-Apr-2019 | Technical / White Paper

Listeria is widely recognised as a universal problem for food and drink manufacturers. To ensure effective listeria management and control, food and drink...

Hygienic design boosts quality and safety

Hygienic design boosts quality and safety

Minebea Intec | 16-Aug-2018 | Technical / White Paper

Avoiding food contamination and increasing product safety are key objectives of all food producers. It is critical to prevent any type of contamination...

Adulteration-and-contamination-white-paper

Adulteration versus contamination, protecting our food

Fera Science Ltd. | 30-Oct-2017 | Technical / White Paper

Adulteration affects the confidence of the public as well as business. Meat products are one of the most commonly adulterated foods – we review the challenges...

With a summer of food scares – be better informed

With a summer of food scares – be better informed

Fera Science Ltd. | 23-Oct-2017 | Technical / White Paper

Recalls and supply chain visibility are big issues right now with a summer of food scares - make sure you have the vital tools to ensure your food defence...

Related suppliers

1 comment

Integrity of food in transport

Posted by Jason Brown,

Why is it not compusory to security seal foods in transit to protect the integrity of the load, have a full and detailed audit trail of all vehicle open and close activity during transit to further provide detailed audit data?

Report abuse