Delays to food safety import controls ‘leave door open for criminals’

By James Ridler contact

- Last updated on GMT

Food crime could rise if food standards slip in the wake of Brexit
Food crime could rise if food standards slip in the wake of Brexit

Related tags: Brexit, Food fraud

Delays in implementing safety and standards legislation for food imported from the EU could leave the door open for more food crime, according to Chartered Institute of Environmental Health Northern Ireland director Gary McFarlane.

Speaking at an Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (EFRA) Select Committee meeting on 16 March, McFarlane stressed the risks to delaying phytosanitary and sanitary checks on meat and seafood products imported from the EU.

“We have to be cognizant that what you’re essentially talking about is potential criminal activity – food crime effectively,”​ said McFarlane. “I think it’s quite interesting that the national food crime unit have increased their capacity significantly just prior to our exit from the EU – you can take from that what you will.

“It’s fair to say that food crime is very much a current risk and I’m sure there have been criminals across the world watching the situation, waiting for opportunities to exploit it. You have to bear in mind the potential to make significant amounts of money here is considerable.”

Food crime and public health

McFarlane noted that food crime did not automatically mean food could pose a risk to public health, but the potential for it was high – particularly in the areas of allergic reactions and mislabelling of products.

He went on to reiterate the importance of the checks and controls on food and drink products in protecting the food standards expected the UK and EU, saying they were not needless bureaucracy.

“It’s important to recognise that the system of checks and controls we have are core health protection, public health controls,” ​McFarlane continued. “They’re not an inconvenience to be got around. They’re there for a reason.

“It is not the majority of diligent operators and legitimate food businesses that we need to be concerned about here. It is those who will set out to thwart the controls and the checks that the system puts in place.”

‘Best system of food safety’

McFarlane warned of the dangers of losing access after Brexit to what he described as the best system of food safety and standards in the world with no clear commitment from Government to commit to legislation that protects those standards.

“I’m quite sure – and I know from speaking to colleagues – that the eyes of unscrupulous operators and individuals out there will have been on this situation and, in simple terms, if we leave the door open for too much or too long there are risks,”​ he concluded.

Also speaking at the EFRA meeting, British Veterinary Association president James Russell highlighted that standards of production for food coming from the EU had not changed. The UK’s decision to maintain alignment with EU legislation had meant risks to food safety were low.

“However, sitting outside the EU, we don’t have access to the range of EU disease surveillance and cooperation systems, which have been so importance for us to understand things like African Swine Fever,”​ Russell explained.

Health certificates

Russell advocated the use of health certificates signed by official vets as a means to protect food safety and standards for products of animal origin in the absence of hard legislation.

“We can have confidence on why we have these certificates done by vets in the first place,”​ he continued. “It’s to give us confidence in either the goods we are purchasing or the goods we are sending out to third countries.

“I think that’s what that veterinary signature does. If your question is ‘when we’ve got these systems in place, can we have confidence in the veracity of the evidence put before us?’, then very much we would hope so – that’s what World Health Organisation rules and trade based rules are based in.”

Related topics: Food Safety, Brexit

Related news

Show more

comments

Post your comment

We will not publish your email address on the website

These comments have not been moderated. You are encouraged to participate with comments that are relevant to our news stories. You should not post comments that are abusive, threatening, defamatory, misleading or invasive of privacy. For the full terms and conditions for commenting see clause 7 of our Terms and Conditions ‘Participating in Online Communities’. These terms may be updated from time to time, so please read them before posting a comment. Any comment that violates these terms may be removed in its entirety as we do not edit comments. If you wish to complain about a comment please use the "REPORT ABUSE" button or contact the editors.

Follow us

Products

View more

Webinars