Digitalisation needed to meet new safety standards

By James Ridler contact

- Last updated on GMT

Digitalisation is the only way to meet food compliance, claims Systems Integration
Digitalisation is the only way to meet food compliance, claims Systems Integration
Digitalisation of the quality assurance (QA) process is the only way food and drink firms will be able to achieve compliance with the new British Retail Consortium (BRC) Global Standards for Food Safety, the head of a food compliance software provider has warned.

Rob Stephens, managing director of Systems Integration, said Issue 8 of the standards – published in August – posed a significant challenge for the industry in proving compliance, document control and reporting.

Looking at the new recommendations and changes to the previous report, the direction of travel continues to focus on the accurate management of data and, in particular, ensuring that every business can provide one version of the truth,”​ said Stephens.

“This can only be achieved effectively by digitalising the QA manual. Otherwise, there is no way food businesses can ensure that the hundreds of QA tasks required at different periods in time, from hourly checks to weekly, monthly and annual assessments are correctly completed.”

Difficult to complete tasks

Operations managers working for food and drink processors that are still reliant on paper-based records will find it very difficult to ensure QA tasks are completed at the right time, he added.

Stephens also warned that, in terms of ‘proof points’, it was impossible to demonstrate that the information was obtained at that specific time and reported correctly.

“This is the reason why the digitalisation of the QA manual is so important; it provides the opportunity to eliminate the reliance on paper processes and fundamentally drive compliance,”​ Stephens concluded.

“Powered by real-time data, individuals or groups of people can be alerted to required actions throughout the day, month and year electronically. It also plays the important role of recording information as data entries, instead of lines on a sheet of paper.”

Act in real time

Stephens called on producers to act in real time and make sure record-keeping could have a positive impact on quality and food provenance.

Meanwhile, last month, the Food Standards Agency (FSA) criticised the BRC’s latest publication​ for its supposed lack of collaboration with the organisation.

FSA board member David Brooks expressed his disappointment that third-party assurance schemes such as the BRC had not consulted with his organisation more.

We’ve had a new version of BRC standards come out in the last month or so and it’s disappointing that our ability to be involved in its creation has been limited or possibly nil,”​​ said Brooks.

Related topics: Food Safety, IT

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Adulteration-and-contamination-white-paper

Adulteration versus contamination, protecting our food

Fera Science Ltd. | 30-Oct-2017 | Technical / White Paper

Adulteration affects the confidence of the public as well as business. Meat products are one of the most commonly adulterated foods – we review the challenges...

How to improve your demand planning

How to improve your demand planning

Columbus-SIC-Food-2017 | 09-Oct-2017 | Infographic

Like most food companies, one of your key issues is likely to be around matching your supply and demand through accurate planning. By downloading our short...

How to enhance costing and pricing of food items

How to enhance costing and pricing of food items

Columbus-SIC-Food-2017 | 25-Sep-2017 | Technical / White Paper

Are you satisfied with how your business goals translate into accurate costing and healthy margins? By downloading our short guide you will learn how ERP...

Related suppliers

comments

Post your comment

We will not publish your email address on the website

These comments have not been moderated. You are encouraged to participate with comments that are relevant to our news stories. You should not post comments that are abusive, threatening, defamatory, misleading or invasive of privacy. For the full terms and conditions for commenting see clause 7 of our Terms and Conditions ‘Participating in Online Communities’. These terms may be updated from time to time, so please read them before posting a comment. Any comment that violates these terms may be removed in its entirety as we do not edit comments. If you wish to complain about a comment please use the "REPORT ABUSE" button or contact the editors.

Follow us

Featured Events

View more

Products

View more