ECJ decision on balsamic vinegar

By Rod Addy

- Last updated on GMT

A new ruling on balsamic vinegar eschews need for designation of origin
A new ruling on balsamic vinegar eschews need for designation of origin

Related tags: Regulation

Balsamic vinegar does not have to originate from Modena, according to a 4 December ruling by the European Court of Justice (ECJ).

The court ruled that the term ‘Balsamico’ is not protected as a designation of origin or geographical indication.

Legal firm Squire Patton Boggs successfully represented its client, German firm Balema, in the legal case, which began in 2015. Partner Dr Christofer Eggers commented on the verdict: “I am very happy that the ECJ has agreed with our view and that we have been able to achieve ultimate success for our client after years of legal proceedings. In addition, we are happy that this ruling finally ensures that Balsamico can legally come from Germany.”

The case attracted the interest of the governments of Germany, Greece and France. These countries maintained the terms ‘aceto’, ‘aceto Balsamico’ and ‘Balsamico’ were all generic, non-geographical names and only the entire term ‘Aceto Balsamico di Modena’ should be protected.

Related topics: Legal


Post your comment

We will not publish your email address on the website

These comments have not been moderated. You are encouraged to participate with comments that are relevant to our news stories. You should not post comments that are abusive, threatening, defamatory, misleading or invasive of privacy. For the full terms and conditions for commenting see clause 7 of our Terms and Conditions ‘Participating in Online Communities’. These terms may be updated from time to time, so please read them before posting a comment. Any comment that violates these terms may be removed in its entirety as we do not edit comments. If you wish to complain about a comment please use the "REPORT ABUSE" button or contact the editors.