Brexit ‘legislative tsunami’ threatens food law

By James Ridler contact

- Last updated on GMT

Watkins warned of the threat of a 'legislative tsunami' after Brexit
Watkins warned of the threat of a 'legislative tsunami' after Brexit
The threat of a “legislative tsunami” in the wake of Brexit could leave the food industry lacking consistency across regulations, according to an expert in food law.

Dominic Watkins, head of food law at DWF, said it was key for the UK to integrate EU laws into domestic laws to provide consistency for manufacturers. However, the sheer scale of the number of laws that needed to be transferred could prove difficult, he added.

Speaking at Food Matters Live, Watkins said: “In order to achieve that, we need to do something with the vast amount of EU regulation​. Something like 95% of food law comes from the EU and the vast majority of that is in regulation.

“You suddenly get into a legislative tsunami. About 7,000 EU legislations have to come across and there are 900 directives that, while slightly easier to integrate, are cross-referenced in UK law.”

Food definition

One example Watkins gave was the actual definition of food, which UK law relies on EU legislation to specify.

Despite the overwhelming number of EU laws the Government has committed to transfer – as referenced in the withdrawal act – exiting the EU did present the opportunity for policy-makers to implement new laws that better serve the UK, said Watkins.

“When we transpose them, we cease to be stuck by what the EU previously said – it gives the opportunity for divergence,”​ he added. “Things like nutrition and health claims could be done differently.

“Front-of-pack labelling is one example. In a post Brexit environment, there’s no theoretical reason why we couldn’t choose to do something different for products sold in the UK.”

Passionate

Watkins urged the food industry to be proactive and seek clarity and assurance around the legislation that applied to them before Brexit. If the industry was passionate about getting the best deal for themselves, then now was the time to push the Government to get what they needed in a post-Brexit Britain, he said.

On the topic of getting ready for a no-deal or cliff-edge Brexit, Watkins said businesses couldn’t be too prepared for whatever outcome the UK approaches in March 2019.

“If you’re prepared for the worst and we end up with a deal that essentially says the status quo will continue, then you may have wasted a little bit of time now and it may have been at some additional cost, but that’s better than having a massive impact on trade and your ability to do business​,” he concluded.

Related topics: Business News, Regulation, Brexit Debate

Related news

Show more

comments

Post your comment

We will not publish your email address on the website

These comments have not been moderated. You are encouraged to participate with comments that are relevant to our news stories. You should not post comments that are abusive, threatening, defamatory, misleading or invasive of privacy. For the full terms and conditions for commenting see clause 7 of our Terms and Conditions ‘Participating in Online Communities’. These terms may be updated from time to time, so please read them before posting a comment. Any comment that violates these terms may be removed in its entirety as we do not edit comments. If you wish to complain about a comment please use the "REPORT ABUSE" button or contact the editors.