Meat tax ‘a sledgehammer to break a nut’

By James Ridler contact

- Last updated on GMT

The introduction of a meat tax to promote healthy eating was criticised by Wales’ meat industry body
The introduction of a meat tax to promote healthy eating was criticised by Wales’ meat industry body
The introduction of a tax on meat to save lives and reduce healthcare costs would be like using ‘a sledgehammer to break a nut’, a national meat trade body has claimed.

Dr Carrie Ruxton, member of Hybu Cig Cymru - Meat Promotion Wales’ meat advisory panel said that the tax, proposed in a research document by scientists at the University of Oxford, was ill advised and potentially ignored the main health benefits of eating meat.

“Red meat provides valuable nutrients, such as iron, zinc, vitamin D and B vitamins. These are often in short supply in the diets of young children, teenage girls and women, especially those from lower-income households,” ​said Ruxton.

A tax on red meat would be a retrograde step, both for overall diet quality in women and girls and for health inequalities.”

Ruxton argued that there was no high-quality evidence linking red and processed meat with heart disease, stroke or diabetes and a risk of bowel cancer only applied when weekly intakes exceeded 700g.

‘Sledgehammer to crack a nut’

She added: “As few people in the UK are at this level of consumption, a general meat tax would be like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.

“Chronic disease prevention would be far more effective if it focused on smoking, excess drinking, and body weight rather than a single food source like meat, which brings many nutritional benefits.”

The report, published in the medical journal PLOS One​, claimed that a general meat tax could prevent more than 220,000 deaths and save over $40bn (£30.4bn) in healthcare costs globally every year.

Leader of the study Dr Marco Springmann from the Nuffield Department of Population Health at University of Oxford, said: “The consumption of red and processed meat exceeds recommended levels in most high- and middle-income countries.

“This is having significant impacts, not only on personal health, but also on healthcare systems, which are taxpayer-funded in many countries, and on the economy, which is losing its labour force due to ill health and care for family members who fall ill.”

Make healthier choices.

The report suggested that, much like a tax on other products that harm health, a tax on red and processed meat would encourage consumers to make healthier choices.

It suggested that if such a tax were introduced, consumption of processed meat would decline by about two portions per week in high-income countries and by 16% globally, while unprocessed red meat consumption would remain steady – this was due to consumers substituting it for processed meat.

“I hope that governments will consider introducing a health levy on red and processed meat as part of a range of measures to make healthy and sustainable decision-making easier for consumers,”​ added Springmann.

“A health levy on red and processed meat would not limit choices, but send a powerful signal to consumers and take pressure off our healthcare systems.” 

Related topics: Regulation, Meat & poultry

Related news

Show more

3 comments

Conflict of Interest

Posted by Chris,

Any comments by Dr Carrie Ruxton represent a complete conflict of interest and should be treated as such. Industries can always drag up a Dr. on their payroll to reject a report/recommendation that may have an adverse impact on profits - or challenge their operations.

Report abuse

Misguided?

Posted by Helen W,

My feeling is that taxing red meat won't force families into eating healthier alternatives at all, more towards the more heavily processed products that already cheaper.
E.g why buy lean steak mince and make your own bolognese when it will be cheaper to buy a processed ready meal.

Report abuse

What is going on?

Posted by Dave,

Fresh meat is one of the purest foods available today. Why not a tax on sugary breakfast cereal and processed snack foods? This is a drastic move that has to be resisted. Is Mr. Springman a vegetarian? Is he using the faulty science we've been force fed for the last 40 years? There are so many foods filled with rubbish chemicals out there to look at first.

Report abuse

Post your comment

We will not publish your email address on the website

These comments have not been moderated. You are encouraged to participate with comments that are relevant to our news stories. You should not post comments that are abusive, threatening, defamatory, misleading or invasive of privacy. For the full terms and conditions for commenting see clause 7 of our Terms and Conditions ‘Participating in Online Communities’. These terms may be updated from time to time, so please read them before posting a comment. Any comment that violates these terms may be removed in its entirety as we do not edit comments. If you wish to complain about a comment please use the "REPORT ABUSE" button or contact the editors.

Follow us

Featured Events

View more

Products

View more