Small processors still threatened by hygiene charges

By Rod Addy contact

- Last updated on GMT

Related tags: European parliament, European union

Small businesses could face charges of up to £500 for each hygiene inspection
Small businesses could face charges of up to £500 for each hygiene inspection
Small processors still face hygiene inspection charges under EU law proposals, despite lobbying to overturn them, prompting an angry reaction from a prominent lobbyist.

A clause exempting small businesses from such costs was deleted as part of the European Commission’s review of the regulation covering official controls of food, feed and animal welfare and health (882/2004). That caused an outcry from small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

The matter was debated by the European Parliament’s Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI) committee on April 14. However, FoodManufacture.co.uk understands little has changed.

Glenis Willmott, leader of the European Parliamentary Labour Party and Member of the European Parliament (MEP) has claimed proposals allow for individual Member States to decide how inspections would be financed. She also said Labour MEPs did not want to see small businesses facing additional costs they could not afford.

£500 for each inspection

However, Bob Salmon, director, Food Solutions, who compiled a petition​ signed by more than 1,100 small businesses pressing MEPs to vote against scrapping the exemption, said they could still end up bearing costs. These could be as much as £500 for each inspection.

“So many are saying if this charge comes in, it will be uneconomic and they will have to close down,”​ said Salmon.

He recognised there was an urgent need to finance food inspectors, especially as he was picking up on worrying feedback from local authorities about plans to cut staff.

“The forecasts I am getting from a number of local authorities are that they are going to halve the number of inspectors by the middle of next year,”​ he said. “Some authorities I have heard of are going down to one inspector for their area.”

Food fraud

That was especially alarming in the wake of the horsemeat food fraud scandal last year and further revelations today (April 17) regarding fraudulent substitution of other meats for lamb in takeaway food​, he added. However, forcing small firms with wafer-thin margins, which made up 80% of the food and drink manufacturing sector, was not the answer and would damage the economy, he claimed.

Willmott cautioned that much would depend on the final outcome of negotiations and the position of the next European Parliament following elections in May.

A final decision by the European Council and Parliament is thought to be unlikely until later in 2015. And a decision would then have to be made on the issue at Westminster.

Related topics: Food Safety, Hygiene, safety & cleaning

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Modern ERP system enables food waste reduction

Modern ERP system enables food waste reduction

Epicor | 05-Sep-2019 | Technical / White Paper

We’re all becoming increasingly aware and mindful of wastage in our personal lives. Food waste is already a significant concern for the food and beverage...

Listeria Management & Drainage: 5 Essential Steps

Listeria Management & Drainage: 5 Essential Steps

Aco Building Drainage | 26-Apr-2019 | Technical / White Paper

Listeria is widely recognised as a universal problem for food and drink manufacturers. To ensure effective listeria management and control, food and drink...

Minimise the impact of product recalls Post-Brexit

Minimise the impact of product recalls Post-Brexit

Epicor | 10-Dec-2018 | Technical / White Paper

The impact of Brexit on current legislation is a topic of much conversation and debate. When it comes to product recalls the uncertainty around what may...

Related suppliers

1 comment

Observations on inspections

Posted by Derrick Blunden,

When national governments incorporate this legislation could they exempt suitably GFSI Certificated Companies from local inspection?
They could also use the charges as incentives to businesses by only charging for revisits when first inspection fails (subject to independent review)
The halving of inspectors? I have heard reports of a deliberate policy being applied to discourage business development that would raise the risk level and therefor increase the required frequency of inspection. That's the way to get out of recession and increase tax revenue...not!

Report abuse