Irradiation could have stopped E.coli crisis: CPA ceo

By Ben Bouckley

- Last updated on GMT

Irradiation could have stopped E.coli crisis: CPA ceo
The deadly Escherichia coli crisis that killed 47 people in Germany alone and left thousands seriously ill could almost certainly have been averted by irradiating the fenugreek seeds blamed for the outbreak.

That’s according to Dominic Dyer, ceo of the Crop Protection Association, who told that wider irradiation of (particularly organic) foodstuffs within the UK and EU would seriously reduce the risk of foodborne illness.

Food irradiation involves exposing it to electron beams, X-rays or gamma rays. Once absorbed the energy forms molecules called ‘free radicals’ that kill micro-organisms such as campylobacter, salmonella and E.coli.

Dyer said the fact that it was unfortunate that a German farm at the centre of the outbreak was organic, when it could just as easily have been run on conventional lines, and that a wider debate was needed on the safety of irradiation within the wider food chain.

Polarised views

However, Dyer noted entrenched opposition within the European organic industry to technologies like irradiation, due to standards that exclude it developed by trade bodies such as the Soil Association (SA).

Despite being endorsed as safe by the Food Standards Agency (FSA) and bodies such as the World Health Organisation and the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation, irradiation is permitted only for seven EU food categories.

Detailed under the Food Irradiation (England) Regulations 2009, these include fruit; vegetables; cereals; bulbs and tubers; dried herbs, spices and vegetable seasonings; fish and shellfish; poultry.

Dyer said that the US government considered allowing irradiation under the US National Organic Standards in the late 1990s, but that 300,000 petitions from public and organisations including European trade associations deterred it from doing so.

If the US regulatory authorities had allowed irradiation, Dyer said he believed there might have been more pressure to follow suit here in Europe, and that irradiation would not have been viewed by consumers with distrust (along the same lines as GM) and might have been used more widely.

“But views became very polairsed, and the organic industry here wanted to be seen as pure as pure can be,” ​he said.

Irrational fears

“Irrational fears”​ had held back a technology that, when used properly, posed a minimal risk to public health and presented less of a risk than heavy mobile phone use or staring at plasma screen, Dyer said.

While safety guidelines – followed by most UK organic producers – reduced risk, he added that irradiation was the only way to eradicate risk when producing “inherently risky” ​products such as beansprouts.

Irradiating the Egyptian fenugreek seeds in question would have prevented the German E.coli outbreak with 99.999% certainty, Dyer said.

An SA spokeswoman said that there was no treatment, “whether in an organic or non-organic system”​ that could guarantee the removal of dormant pathogens from sprouting seeds or sprouts.

Instead, she argued, it was vital to control risks throughout the food chain, where organic growers and processors undergo independent inspections to qualify for SA certification, and follow stricy safety guidelines.

Moreover, irradiation was not allowed under EU organic regulations ensuring the “integrity and vital qualities”​ of the product, she added, while there was also a lack of long-term studies examining the health impacts of irradiated food.

The spokeswoman added that irradiation was not permitted in non-organic foods such as dairy (due to flavour changes) and some fruits, as it causes tissue softening.

Irradiation could also kill plant workers if safeguards were not followed, she said, while irradiation of cat food imported into Australia was banned in May 2009 after it was linked to feline deaths.

“It is also impossible to tell if food has been irradiated beyond the maximum dose permitted,”​ she said.

Related topics: Food Safety, Fresh produce

Related news

Show more


Show more

Irradiation is mortal

Posted by Nemanja,

Irradiation may not be harmful for packaging or inorganic food additives like salt. In all other food, which does contain proteins, fat and other food ingredients, they are partly ionized while being irradiated and free radicals are formed. they cause cancer. Basically, the same thing happens if a person is exposed to radiation (Chernobyl, Fukushima etc.) Your tissue gets ionized, and DNA gets wrong information about self-replicating, plus free-radical and other effects and you die.

Report abuse

Déjà vu

Posted by Morton Satin,

The SA spokesperson represents the superstitious cranks of the world that have held irradiation back for decades. Killing plant workers indeed! Would a worker step into a canning retort - would a baker walk into a hot oven - really! The depth of ignorance is staggering.

It's this precise attitude that kept pasteurization back in the UK for decades after it was mandaory in other countries. Yet, when pasteurization was finally adopted, none of those Merchants of Menace had to courage to stand up and take responsibility for the thousands of deaths that they could have prevented had they heeded science rather than superstitious ignorance.

Report abuse

Get on board with reality.

Posted by Dean Mefford,

There are plenty of studies that has been done and the results have told us that the lives that would be saved with this completely safe procedure far offset any risk. I ran a packaging company where we used irradiation in making packaging for the meat and cheese industry to allow longer shelf life. We never had a problem in the plant with employee danger. If the meat industry that used the bags had been allowed to irradiate the meat they put in the bags then a lot of people who are dead would be alive today.

Report abuse

Follow us

Featured Events

View more


View more