SUBSCRIBE

Inside food & drink manufacturing

Headlines > People

Read more breaking news

 

 

Bernard Matthews seller denies pension claims

Post a comment
Matt Atherton

By Matt Atherton+

19-Apr-2017
Last updated on 20-Apr-2017 at 11:58 GMT2017-04-20T11:58:09Z

Rutland Partners refuted pension claims
Rutland Partners refuted pension claims

The former owner of Bernard Matthews, Rutland Partners, has denied claims made by a select committee, that it was more concerned with “lining its pockets” than safeguarding workers’ rights.

Responding to criticism from the influential Work and Pensions Committee, Rutland Partners disputed claims it forced through a pre-pack administration deal with Boparan Private Office, instead of accepting a preliminary buyout offer, which it said were “factually inaccurate”.

A Rutland Partners statement said: “Rutland has a long and established reputation in the UK market for its honesty and integrity, and categorically refutes any suggestion that the outcome of our investment in Bernard Matthews was engineered to ‘line our pockets’, as has been widely suggested in the media.

‘Sought to protect the future’

“At all times Rutland sought to protect the future of the business, those it employed, and including those who had built up defined benefit pensions through their service.”

Rutland Partners’ comments came after the Work and Pensions Committee published letters from the current owner of Bernard Matthews, Boparan Private Office, and administrator Deloitte.

The letters claimed Rutland Partners rejected a buyout offer that would have protected workers’ pension scheme, in favour of an insolvency process, which would have a greater financial benefit for it.

Boparan Private Office chief financial officer Steve Henderson wrote: “In July 2016, Boparan made an offer to buy the whole share capital of Bernard Matthews (which included all assets & liabilities including pension liabilities), but this offer was rejected by the owner Rutland Partners.

‘Why the offer was rejected’

“The offer was sufficient to repay the bank (first charge) and by acquiring the share capital, Boparan would have taken on the pension liability. But, Rutland Partners would not have received full repayment of their loan notes and interest and we assume this latter point is why the offer was rejected.”

Bernard Matthews workers’ pension scheme was transferred from a defined benefit company pension scheme to Pension Protection Fund (PPF) assessment.

Work and Pensions Committee chair Frank Field MP said: “I have confidence that the PPF, working with the scheme trustees, will act in the best interests of the pensioners, but it's clear that the former owners passed up a better deal for pension scheme members in favour of lining their own pockets.”

Bernard Matthews was sold to Boparan Private Office in September. The deal secured the future of 2,000 jobs, it was claimed.

 

Bernard Matthews sale row – at a glance
  • Select committee claimed Rutland Partners was more interested in “lining their own pockets” than workers
  • First acquisition offer rejected would have secured workers’ pension schemes
  • Second acquisition offer accepted, but pension scheme transferred to PPF
  • Rutland Partners refutes claims

Post a comment

Comment title *
Your comment *
Your name *
Your email *

We will not publish your email on the site

I agree to Terms and Conditions

These comments have not been moderated. You are encouraged to participate with comments that are relevant to our news stories. You should not post comments that are abusive, threatening, defamatory, misleading or invasive of privacy. For the full terms and conditions for commenting see clause 7 of our Terms and Conditions ‘Participating in Online Communities’. These terms may be updated from time to time, so please read them before posting a comment. Any comment that violates these terms may be removed in its entirety as we do not edit comments. If you wish to complain about a comment please use the "REPORT ABUSE" button or contact the editors.

Related products