SUBSCRIBE

Inside food & drink manufacturing

Hot Topics > Obesity Debate

FSS backs extending sugar tax beyond soft drinks

2 comments
Matt Atherton

By Matt Atherton+

19-Jun-2017
Last updated on 19-Jun-2017 at 11:13 GMT2017-06-19T11:13:54Z

Sugar tax must be extended beyond soft drinks, says Food Standards Scotland
Sugar tax must be extended beyond soft drinks, says Food Standards Scotland

Advice to extend the sugar tax beyond soft drinks, order the reformulation of products to cut sugar, fat and salt, and lower portion sizes, has won the support of Food Standards Scotland (FSS).

The wide-ranging measures to tackle Scotland’s obesity crisis were advised in a report by the University of Stirling, commissioned by FSS. Manufacturers and retailers should both promote healthy choices, the report added.

The Scottish food watchdog called for a “retail revolution”, including extending the sugar tax beyond soft drinks.

‘Retail revolution’

FSS senior dietary advisor Gillian Purdon said: “The report supports FSS views and recommendations for the need to extend sugar tax beyond soft drinks, to reformulate products to reduce sugar fat and salt, to resize portions, address less healthy food promotion and to provide clearer consumer information on products in both the retail and out of home sectors.

“We believe it is vital that action is taken to change the imbalance of in-store promotions in favour of healthier food and that consumers have the clearest possible information to make informed choices.”

A ‘food retail standard’ should also be introduced to regulate product promotions in supermarkets, the report claimed. Funding for trials to establish which promotion interventions worked best should also be acquired.

Co-author of the report Professor Leigh Sparks said: “The environment confronting consumers is not a neutral one, allowing ‘free choice’. Promotions and product information shape consumers’ choices and behaviours. Retailing is both part of the problem, but could be a major part of the solution.

‘Alter the architecture of in-store choice’

“Voluntary initiatives and simple healthy promotions have failed. The time to consider a range of actions to alter the architecture of in-store choice may now be upon us.”

Shoppers are currently “bombarded” with presentations, prices and promotions that favour unhealthy products, the university said.

Sparks added: “Consumers are attracted to, and purchase, these products above others, often on promotion, and often in bulk sizes far beyond immediate consumption needs.

“There is a need to understand and adjust the retail environment presented to customers in-store, as this drives choice decisions.”

The report will help FSS to develop new approaches to improve the balance of food promoted by retailers, FSS said. A combination of measures would be needed to encourage healthier eating, but regulation promotions of HFSS products was a priority, it added.

University of Stirling report recommendations
  • Regulation of product pack displays, pricing and promotions
  • Levies on salt, fat and sugar
  • Funding for trials to establish which interventions work best
  • Introduction of a ‘Food Retail Standard’
  • Measures to be required by all food consumption and purchasing outlets

Post a comment

Comment title *
Your comment *
Your name *
Your email *

We will not publish your email on the site

I agree to Terms and Conditions

These comments have not been moderated. You are encouraged to participate with comments that are relevant to our news stories. You should not post comments that are abusive, threatening, defamatory, misleading or invasive of privacy. For the full terms and conditions for commenting see clause 7 of our Terms and Conditions ‘Participating in Online Communities’. These terms may be updated from time to time, so please read them before posting a comment. Any comment that violates these terms may be removed in its entirety as we do not edit comments. If you wish to complain about a comment please use the "REPORT ABUSE" button or contact the editors.

2 comments

It's not just the kids

I agree entirely with Chris' comment, but the same also applies to adults. It is amazing to me that the UK government has gone to the trouble of collecting data on food consumption in the UK since 1974, which has shown a decline in calories, fat and sugar, and yet ignore this evidence to demonise the food industry. A good summary can be found here https://iea.org.uk/blog/the-fat-lie-the-real-cause-of-the-rise-in-obesity.

Report abuse

Posted by Simon W
22 June 2017 | 12h162017-06-22T12:16:34Z

Sugar and Obesity

The problem with obesity in children is not down to sugar intake solely.
Modern day children get very little exercise due to spending most of their free time on either computers or mobile phones, meaning they do not burn off excess fat and this is the problem.
Instead of taxing manufacturers why not look at changing habits, encourage after school activities, spend more time in the gym whilst at school and actively encourage play at home as it's not just the kids who are lazy but also the parents.

Report abuse

Posted by Chris. Husband
22 June 2017 | 12h062017-06-22T12:06:29Z

Related suppliers

On demand Supplier Webinars

Sustainable snacking trends for 2017
William Reed Business Media
All supplier webinars