SUBSCRIBE

Breaking News on the Food and Drink Manufacturing Sector

Headlines > Food Safety

Jamie Oliver: ‘government inaction’ worsens obesity

1 commentBy Mike Stones , 23-Apr-2012
Last updated on 23-Apr-2012 at 15:16 GMT

The government is deepening the obesity crisis by allowing flagship academies to lower national nutritional standards, warns Jamie Oliver.

The celebrity chef claimed academies had been allowed to ignore national standards and some were ‘profiteering’ through junk food sales from vending machines.

In an interview with The Observer, Oliver accused Michael Gove, secretary of state for education of “playing with fire” in allegedly allowing standards to drop.

“This mantra that we are not going to tell schools what to do, just isn’t good enough in the midst of the biggest fxxxxxg obesity epidemic ever,” he told the Sunday newspaper.

Luck or chance

The public health of 5M children should not be left to “luck or chance”, he said.

Urgent action was needed to remedy soaring obesity rates – particularly among the young, Oliver continued. The current generation of children was the first to contain some who were expected to die before their parents duet to obesity-related illness.

“Tell me, Mr Gove, Mr Lansley [health secretary], how do you plan to change that? What is in your arsenal? The fact is, they are doing nothing.

But last week, Lansley said: “More had been achieved to improve public health in the past two years than in the previous two decades.

Speaking at the Food and Drink Federation President’s Dinner, one year on from the launch of the Public Health Responsibility Deal (PHRD),  Lansley said: “The test [of  the PHRD] is to achieve more, more quickly by voluntary action that would be achieved by costly and intrusive regulation. There is no doubt we are achieving that.”

No justification

Meanwhile, a contributor to The Guardian’s website, signing himself Jamted, wrote yesterday (April 22): “Even if he [Gove] clings to the idea that academies and free schools should teach what they like, there’s no justification for exempting them from national nutritional standards.

“Are they exempt from regulations on health and safety, insurance, building standards etc?”

No one from the Department for Education was available for comment.

Earlier this year, Paul Gately, professor of exercise and obesity at Leeds Metropolitan University, said focusing resources on the seriously obese would do far more to reduce the £5.1bn that diseases associated with obesity cost the NHS each year.

Of 30M children in the UK, 4.5M were overweight and of these, 2.5M were obese, said Gately.“140,000 of them are so obese that if they were adults, they would immediately be eligible for surgery. There are no services for that whatsoever. That is quite frightening.”

To read the full story, click here .

Subscribe to our FREE newsletter

Get FREE access to authoritative breaking news, videos, podcasts, webinars and white papers. SUBSCRIBE

1 comment (Comments are now closed)

What about the caterers who are 'doing it'?

As md of a UK school catering company, these debates sometimes worry me. Not because the issues are unimportant - they most certainly are - but because they sometimes hide the great work we are doing.

Take a closer look and you'll see that we double, triple, quadruple uptake of school dinners by putting nutritional standards first. Yes, I want tighter standards in academies. But I also want the protagonists in these debates to take a closer look at us and use us model in future deliberations.

Report abuse

Posted by Steve Quinn
23 April 2012 | 19h37

Related products